Chapter 813 — Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants
ORS 813.606 Exception for employee otherwise required to have device
Notwithstanding ORS 813.604, if a person is required, in the course and scope of the person’s employment, to operate a motor vehicle owned by the person’s employer, the person may operate that vehicle without installation of an ignition interlock device if:
The employer has been notified:
That the employee is operating with a hardship permit restricted as provided in
ORS 813.604;
That the employee is operating on a fully reinstated license within the first year following suspension or revocation for the employee’s first conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicants;
That the employee is operating on a fully reinstated license within the second year following suspension or revocation for the employee’s second or subsequent conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicants; or
That the employee has driving privileges and is otherwise required to install an ignition interlock device as a condition of a driving while under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement; and
The employee has proof of the notification and, if applicable, a fully reinstated license in the possession of the employee while operating the employer’s vehicle in the course of employment.
Official sources · 2Tap to view provenance and version history
Provenance
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes
Official online edition
- Source
- oregonlegislature.gov
- SHA-256
c8dbfd20…10a26dc6- Review
- auto verified
Version history
Prior statutory text is not available in the ingested published editions. Consult an earlier official ORS edition or the cited Oregon Laws chapter.
2025 Oregon Revised Statutes — official online source · active · operative text
Official source2023 Oregon Revised Statutes · active · operative text
Official source